The Lombard Review
Economy

One more hike, then what?

Loss function favours holding over hiking

The Marriner S. Eccles Building, headquarters of the Federal Reserve Board, Washington
The Marriner S. Eccles Building, headquarters of the Federal Reserve Board, WashingtonPhoto: Federalreserve / Wikimedia Commons, Public domain

With futures markets pricing an overwhelming ninety-eight per cent probability of a quarter-point rate increase at the July FOMC meeting, the outcome of the policy decision is a foregone conclusion. The genuine strategic debate centers entirely on what happens thereafter. Having lifted the policy rate above 5.25 per cent in the most aggressive tightening cycle in four decades, the Federal Reserve’s asymmetric loss function is shifting rapidly toward caution.

The U.S. Capitol at night
The U.S. Capitol at nightPhoto: Diliff / Wikimedia Commons, Public domain

The Asymmetric Loss Function

Each additional rate increase delivers diminishing disinflationary returns while exponentially escalating the risk of systemic financial accident. With real rates now deeply in restrictive territory, the committee can afford to allow time and policy lags to do the remaining disinflationary heavy lifting. Pausing to assess the cumulative macroeconomic drag is vastly preferable to overshooting and engineering a sovereign credit or banking crisis.

The Lower Manhattan skyline from Liberty Island
The Lower Manhattan skyline from Liberty IslandPhoto: Percival Kestreltail / Wikimedia Commons, CC BY-SA 3.0

Lifting rates in July is the easy choice for the Fed; the true institutional test will be resisting the temptation to over-tighten when headline data remains deceptively resilient.