The Lombard Review
Economy

3.3% growth: too good to be true?

Output vs hours decomposition

The trading floor of the Frankfurt Stock Exchange
The trading floor of the Frankfurt Stock ExchangePhoto: Ank Kumar / Wikimedia Commons, CC BY-SA 4.0

The US economy capped 2023 with a spectacular flourish, expanding at an annualized clip of 3.3 per cent in the fourth quarter and utterly pulverizing consensus expectations of a slowdown. The headline figure was celebrated as definitive proof that the United States has achieved macroeconomic escape velocity. Yet quantitative analysts who decompose the output data find reasons for intellectual caution.

The Lower Manhattan skyline from Liberty Island
The Lower Manhattan skyline from Liberty IslandPhoto: Percival Kestreltail / Wikimedia Commons, CC BY-SA 3.0

Decomposing the Boom

Decomposing the GDP figure reveals that a massive surge in net exports, government consumption outlays, and residual inventory accumulation contributed disproportionately to the headline print. Meanwhile, total aggregate hours worked in the private economy barely budged, implying a sudden, miraculous leap in non-farm labor productivity. If productivity has genuinely structurally stepped higher, non-inflationary growth can continue; if the data is flattered by residual deflators, a payback looms.

The Federal Reserve Board's Eccles Building on Constitution Avenue
The Federal Reserve Board's Eccles Building on Constitution AvenuePhoto: AgnosticPreachersKid / Wikimedia Commons, CC BY-SA 3.0

A headline 3.3 per cent GDP print is a stunning statistical achievement, but an output boom powered by government spending and productivity anomalies warrants careful analytical skepticism.